i dont think there should be any limits at all. i was surprised yours didnt make it in , but when you have 1 person making the decisions it falls on that person to explain thier actions. i still dont see where bias or popularity made any difference unless you could make a case that the person picking the 10 somehow picked yours over anyone elses?Originally posted by diangelo#67
ok pap how about my bike it was clearly in the first ten but they went around it?
IMO it should be open to as many quads as there are entrants. the problem with that is you would have the vote/poll so big that it may not be possible. i think it should be left to one person who based on a scale such as SRH posted would define the final 10.
I do not think that the 1st 10 entered should be the quads picked.
I have also tried to stay clear of this contest in almost any fashion, but I would like to see it succeed. My complaint is against open accusations claiming any form of bias or any decisions based on popularity. I think it should be decided by an open poll after the top 10 are picked by using some form of grading etc. If i find out decisions are based on anything other then the merits of the quad and its builder then I will step in.