Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: What's the difference between link and no link?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Marysville, OH Northern Cambria, PA (hometown)
    Posts
    10,717
    john what do u think about the cr500 link on a 250r???

    when u watch walsh, gibson, laegers etc with 500 links its seems like they soak up everything 100 times better then a std link or no link bike... when they case a jump a lil bit or go though whoops it looks like they have a huge advantage over the other bikes....

    j.w why don't u offer it on ur 250rs... ur one of few that dont...

    i'd really like to know more about 500 links bc i want to build one in the near future if i can...

    thanks
    2009 Cbr600RR Phoenix


    WE ARE PENN STATE!!!!!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Marysville, OH Northern Cambria, PA (hometown)
    Posts
    10,717
    i dunno if this is true... but i heard a c-dale uses a copy of the rear end off the KTM mx bike rear end... i dunno how true that is though..
    2009 Cbr600RR Phoenix


    WE ARE PENN STATE!!!!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Johnstown, PA
    Posts
    3,170
    On the Roll LOBO II set up, the shock doesnt sit at a funny angle..it looks like it does when there is a linkage on it and you dont need to have a relocated mout on the frame. What do you think of this set up as compared to other no links, like LSR and some of the others...?
    -Jason Zittel #73-

    Team 373 MX

    ATV Scene.com Budget Racer II TRX450R

    "I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'...


    Thanks to my 2012 Sponsors: Smith Optics, EVS, Globe, Hinson, Tag Metals, Racer X, Outlaw Racing, Pit Posse
    Twin Air


    GET SPONSORED NOW!
    MXSponsor.com
    Promo ID: x573jz

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Johnstown, PA
    Posts
    3,170

    CR500 linkage.

    Well I raced today. (my first race on my new R). And I'll tell ya what...that rear end saved my arse more than time...kickers, casing, and brake bumps, and other spots where I KNOW my stock link would have threw me over the bars, this baby saved me, and it is definitely a lot better than a stock link!! (by the way I ran an Arens swingarm, and Elka rear shock on my stock link). I am not gonna lie though, that stock link set up was DEFINITELY and improvement over stock swingarm and shock..Just a little feedback for everyone who's been asking about these linkages.
    -Jason Zittel #73-

    Team 373 MX

    ATV Scene.com Budget Racer II TRX450R

    "I'm not sayin'...I'm just sayin'...


    Thanks to my 2012 Sponsors: Smith Optics, EVS, Globe, Hinson, Tag Metals, Racer X, Outlaw Racing, Pit Posse
    Twin Air


    GET SPONSORED NOW!
    MXSponsor.com
    Promo ID: x573jz

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    woodruff sc
    Posts
    1,182

    hey man

    i have a lonestar no link r.i sold my other lonestar link bike last year. the no link bike seems to stay hooked up more but my link bike would let the tires spin more and it would slide easer. roll makes a no link conversion its a swing arm and a new shock.but rite now im rideing my 400 it seems easer on me.
    eddysiegers2007 b+25 champ, 2005 mideast vet champ,gncc #770 for 07

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    9,647

    What's the difference between link and no link?

    What is the difference between link and no link setups? What are the advantages? More travel? Easier to adjust? Cheaper? What are the disadvantages?

    How do you convert? Is it as simple as just taking the linkage out, or is it a complete setup that requires a whole new swingarm?

    I want to upgrade my suspension all around, and I see many people talking about no-link setups, and I was wondering if this is an avenue I want to pursue, but I don't know anything about it.
    Duncan Racing 340PV, +2 A-arms, +4 LSR axle, and a host of other goodies.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    9,647
    So, the long and short of it is, unless I plan on racing flattrack, I probably don't want a no-link setup...
    Duncan Racing 340PV, +2 A-arms, +4 LSR axle, and a host of other goodies.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    482

    ?

    So what your saying is this, basically is that the linkage allows you to have more travel with less hassle? Well, how about the rear setup on the Cannondale's? What do you think about that? I just want to hear your honest opinion. I've heard that with Position sensitive shocks that it doesnt really matter, is this true?

    Thanks
    2008 KFX450R

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    482

    .

    I dunno, but it does seem very similar now that I think about it.
    2008 KFX450R

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    482

    !

    No wonder they went bankrupt.

    But, is it a good no-link system or is it flawed in someway?
    2008 KFX450R

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •