|
|
Senior Member
i have a 99 400ex i could trade for a restored 86 lt250r with DG front and rear bumper full DG exhaust douglas red label polished rear wheels and douglas wheels, new top end brand new factory wiring harness coil and cdi box. It was pulled apart and everything was pulled apart and repainted. Would this be a good trade? i ride mainly trails and want somthing reliable.. i had a rm125 so i know about 2 strokes...any suggestions?
*2003 z400* Pro-Circuit T-4 slip on, Edelbrock 38mm QuickSilver Carb, Hot Cams stage two cams on the intake and exhaust, Kibblewhile Dual valvesprings with titanium retainers, K+N filter, K+N Powerlid, Big Gun rev box, DG swingarm skidplate, Fly AeroTaper Handlebars, ITP C-Series 10" rims all around, ITP Holeshot H-D's rear, Holeshot XCR's front
Gone:
-2003 crf450
-1999 426ex lots of mods
-2001 rm125
-2003 xr100
dont get a lt250r , mabye a trx250r but the handling of a 400ex is way beter and alot more reliable.
I own a 450ER...
id give you a dunce cap if you did
Long Travel Axis-Mototech TRX450er 2006 in black
"betty"
02 400ex
95 cbr600 runs 11's
1992 Mustang 5.0 Notch-13 sec car
1998 Camaro Z28 Ls1 1LE (1 of 99)
Capable of 12 seconds
Shock Rebuilds DIRT cheap
Member
Stick wiht the 400ex 250r are sweet bikes but not for trail riding. 400 are prefect for trailing.
400ex
Moderator
If memory serves, the 86 isn't a very desirable year. The later years saw a powervalve addition, and a few other improvements.
Duncan Racing 340PV, +2 A-arms, +4 LSR axle, and a host of other goodies.
Registered User
I would keep the 400
Senior Member
Try and find parts for the Suzuki? When something breaks, where are you going to get a swingarm, a-arms,etc. Finding parts for the 400 is easy compared to the 250. The 250 might be fast in a straight line, but it will not corner like the 400. You think that the 400 is hard to sell, try selling the Suzuki to someone.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote