2006 Suzuki LT-R450 QuadRacer

**Punk'd** · 10-02-2005, 10:53 PM

Originally posted by Shift_400EX
who else thinks it looks like the batmoblie hahaha

LOLL I think it looks like a praying mantus with the light

**YFZ450Ridr** · 10-02-2005, 10:53 PM

i like everything, except how wide it is. theres no way that thing will fit on any kind of a trail

but other than that, i like it!

**Butters** · 10-02-2005, 10:55 PM

looks good. i like it better than the yfz and r. props to suzuki to wait and beat what is out.

**troutman561** · 10-02-2005, 10:57 PM

these pics and all those action pics are photo shopped, how could u all be so ignorant

seriously tho i was a critic about the leaked pictures and i was wrong, oh well, i like the 7299 price tag, i was gona go with an 06 450r early next yr but if this gets good reviews i may change my mind

**drifterx** · 10-02-2005, 11:05 PM

Holy hell! If i had the $7300, i'd be making a trip to the Suzuki dealer!

Seriously, this think is bad @$$. It would probaly suck for XC, there's no doubt about that... But, this is the first quad actually set up for MX from the factory. That itself is pretty damn cool imo. I think it looks a lot better with the headlight though, and i'd have to ditch those huge f'ing heel guards!

**Shawn H** · 10-02-2005, 11:25 PM

Man for the wait I Dont think it was worth it..

With it being so wide there is no way it will run in the Stock Class for GNCC>

Looks like the rear grab bar is non-replaceable like the 03 Z400? Correct me if Im worng but thats stupid. I thought they learned this before?

**Honda** · 10-03-2005, 01:12 AM

LOLL I think it looks like a praying mantus with the light

LOL! Some of you guys on here would think Jessica Simpson, (sitting on your lap) was ugly.

The old TRX, the new TRX and the Suzuki are all bad *** looking machines.

What the hell do you want them to look like?

Best looking quads I have ever seen, especially with mods. I personally think the YFZ is ugly.

Go buy a Cannondale, or a Polaris. those are Hot.....LOL!

**balzout** · 10-03-2005, 04:46 AM

it says its 41.6 front track.rear at 38.if this is the width its not that wide the honda is 46 width .i think its a more compact bike so it makes the front look wider than it really is...

**balzout** · 10-03-2005, 04:56 AM

unless that means hub to hub.then you would have to add the offset of the wheel.....dont know but guys think about what zuk is doing for us and the sport.who cares if its ugly...you sound like a bunch of girls...ehhh its ugly ehhhh i dont like that color..lol humorous!this is just the beginning of many good things to come.imagine the competiveness this will bring out in the people who makes those wondeful lil toys we cant wait to throw are leg over again.im impressed.big freakin backflip for you zuk

**Ralph** · 10-03-2005, 04:59 AM

Originally posted by Tommy 17
u go into a GNCC race with 50 inch wide quad u'll be coming out missin a wheel...

if i read the 1st post right it says track width... that means 50 inches i take it...

lol tommy, RACE a GNCC, your not thinking of avg joe who is gonna ride on the farm. Most MX guys used to have to replace a-arms now the xc guys will.

Thread: 2006 Suzuki LT-R450 QuadRacer

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions