Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Rubicon vs. Sportsman 500 H.O.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    110

    Rubicon vs. Sportsman 500 H.O.

    Which is better for mud, trails, working, and reliability?
    2002 400Ex
    -WB R-Series full exhaust
    -11:1 Wiesco-Bored Carb-Stg 1 hotcam
    -K&N filter w/outerwear
    -Douglas 190 wheels
    -Kenda Klaws (rear)
    -Bandits (front)
    -WB Graphix kit
    -Renthal bars
    -Outerwears shock covers
    -AC Bumper & AC Nerfs
    -Armadillo swing arm skid & rear rack
    -OMF Air scoops

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    North of LR, Arkansas
    Posts
    26
    The Rubicon takes the cake on work and reliability.

    The Polaris wins on mud, because if the IRS, which is always better for mud.

    Rubicon can be modded and be good in the mud, but the Polaris modded in the same way will generally beat it in mud.

    There's something I don't like about the motors in Polaris, but Honda has the durable, lasting motor.

    The Polaris will be good to you, if you want to work on it. It just doesn't hold up as well as the Rubicon.

    Hope this helped, and if you got any more questions, lemme know.
    2003 Foreman 450 (Wanting a YFZ)
    2" lift, 28" Titan 589s, K&N w/ outerwears, Double-Sealed Bearings

    www.teambadforeman.vzz.net

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    110
    So basically are you saying the rubicon would be the better "all around" choice?
    2002 400Ex
    -WB R-Series full exhaust
    -11:1 Wiesco-Bored Carb-Stg 1 hotcam
    -K&N filter w/outerwear
    -Douglas 190 wheels
    -Kenda Klaws (rear)
    -Bandits (front)
    -WB Graphix kit
    -Renthal bars
    -Outerwears shock covers
    -AC Bumper & AC Nerfs
    -Armadillo swing arm skid & rear rack
    -OMF Air scoops

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    home town, Poland NY College, Blairsville PA
    Posts
    6,345
    I'd say all around the rubicon is better. I don't like the polaris IRS, or any IRS for that matter, but thats just me. And the sportsman's are around 700 lbs. Too heavy for my liking.
    Andy

    WyoTech....

    AIM; District3250rMX
    Yahoo; Gone_Snowboarding06

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    North of LR, Arkansas
    Posts
    26
    Yep, the Rubicon will "play" more, and will still be fairly decent in the mud. Another thing, if you're gonna be doing work with it, as in towing, you defenitely want SRA over IRS, which chooses the Rubicon.
    2003 Foreman 450 (Wanting a YFZ)
    2" lift, 28" Titan 589s, K&N w/ outerwears, Double-Sealed Bearings

    www.teambadforeman.vzz.net

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2
    I think the Rubicon is the better ATV for reliability.I have never liked polaris,they are just strange . My wife has a bad back but still rides,I bought her an 04 polaris sportsman 500 HO because of the ride,nothing rides like a polaris(one of my friends calls them the hovercrafts). I must admit, it is a good quad,she used to be ready to quit riding after 20 miles,now we run 75 to 80 miles with no back pain. It has good power and kicks *** in the mud,you can even slide it around a little(in 2 wheel drive). We put 600 miles on it this summer with no problems......so far,but im still a Honda man.Im keeping my 400EX.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    1hr from Sand Mountain,UT
    Posts
    484
    have u considered the vinson I realy like my new vinson It is great for plowing and for mud. In the sand my vinson goes more places then my uncles foreman or rubicon. Its been a great bike the only recall there was on it was the gas petcock's leak because the bolts are to long but I heard the new ones are fixed. then fixed are's for free even though It didnt leak. My other uncle has a 04 sportsman 500ho and one of his cv joint went bad and that wasnt cheap You should look into the vinson its a awsome been a awsome bike. Are's has about 300 miles on it we bought the first 05 in salt lake. the only difference in the 05's is the graphics has orange in them and look better.
    GSXR1100w sand quad
    kx250 ( built 310)
    CR500

    91 Mustang SSP 5.8, bored .30 over, 11.1, World heads, injected, baer brakes, tubular f / r suspesion, tremec trans etc
    90 bronco, 6 inch lift, 35's, 393 stroker, built aod, 4.56 gears

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    1hr from Sand Mountain,UT
    Posts
    484
    The vinson is also cheaper.
    GSXR1100w sand quad
    kx250 ( built 310)
    CR500

    91 Mustang SSP 5.8, bored .30 over, 11.1, World heads, injected, baer brakes, tubular f / r suspesion, tremec trans etc
    90 bronco, 6 inch lift, 35's, 393 stroker, built aod, 4.56 gears

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Va.
    Posts
    11
    I DON'T WANT TO SOUND LIKE I FAVOR MY GUAD BECAUSE I DON'T BUT IF YOU LIKE THE MUD AND A SPORTY FEEL AND HANDLING IT'S TUFF TO BEAT THE RINCON I CAN SLIDE AND FLY ON THE TRAILS AND IT DOES GREAT IN THE MUD
    TANK (RINCON)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PAUL IDAHO
    Posts
    30
    If u want a good quad i would go with the honda rubicon or rincon i have a 2003 honda rincon with a little over 5500 miles on it an the only poblem i had was the wheel bering on the front laeft went out because we have very fine dirt hear well any ways i went muddin this summer with one of my budes an he has a 2002 polaris 500 with 4100 miles an it was junk the front diff didnt work the 4wd didnt work in revers an it would only go about 40mph

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •