which is better
|
|
Senior Member
which is better
DG NERFS
PRO DESIGN KILL SWITCH
REBEL FLAG SEAT
SPROCKETS
k&n filter(WITH PRE CHARGER)
We Taken Over This Year..
250r.
"Syrus The Virus"
2003 Honda Rubicon (red)
2002 Honda 450es (yellow)
2002 Oryx t-line equipe 125
2004 FreeAgent Team Limo (Custom)
2002 400ex
Many many dirtbikes... to many..
2001 250ex - SOLD
Originally posted by citizennobody
...dont drink and surf...
Member
the z400 is a fast trail quad. the 250r is a factory race quad. z400-trail 250r-dunes,race.
Registered User
stock vs stock.....i think they are pretty close, but the Z is def better (new z with better suspension)
if you sink money into a Z it can be a kick *** quad......and ofcourse the R can too. so decide if you wanna get a new generation 4-stroke. or a 2-stroke.
-2011 CRF450R
-2003 Cannondale Moto
-1996 GSXR 1100
-1987 TRX350 foreman :-)
-1985 TRX250 fourtrax
www.bvcracing.com
Member
The 250R was and still is considered a " sport quad ", you can
build it into a race quad. The only true " race quads " are the
C-dale Moto and Blaze. They were race ready off the showroom
floor. It takes more than a fast motor and decent shocks to make
a full fledged race bike!
Z400 rider all the way!
Basically, you could take either machine and make it a racer with some money dumped into it. The z has an advantage because it is about 15 years newer and is still being made.
Stock vs stock, they are pretty close power wise (different because 2 vs 4 stroke).
Advantage for the 250r is that you can find them a ton cheaper.
My bike: yellow Z400 with Alba full pipe and flame graphics, K and N filter, Plasma ignition, Lazer lights, PRM skid, AC nerfs, AC bumper Renthals chain and Fatbars, Laeger +2 Arms, Works triple rate w/rezzies Pro Series, revalved rear, Lonestar Axcalibur +3
Brother's quad: LT250r with fmf fatty pipe, renthals, metaltech swing arm
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote