ridered86
03-30-2003, 02:52 PM
Snappy Answers to Stupid Liberal Soundbytes
Use this handy guide to tell you which snappy answer to give whenever a liberal uses their stupid soundbytes to help Saddam Hussein.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is taking unilateral action against Iraq!
So far, it's a 90-member worldwide "unilateral" coalition.
We are in a rush to war.
An 11-year rush?
Tough inspections can disarm Saddam Hussein without invading Iraq.
11 years of inspections have done wonders so far.
We should let the inspectors finish their job.
We did. They didn't. We will.
Why fight? The Iraqi military is weaker than in 1991.
But their biological weapons and chemical weapons are much more dangerous.
If we invade, Saddam Hussein might use those weapons of mass destruction against us.
I thought you said Iraq didn't have them?
But terrorists might attack if we invade Iraq.
Oh…so if we don't attack Iraq, terrorists will never strike again?
We shouldn't go to war without a UN resolution.
ANOTHER resolution? What about the last 16 resolutions? Shall we use them as wallpaper? Or shall we use the same resolutions Bill Clinton used in Bosnia?
We don't have a real declaration for war.
It's called "Joint Congressional Resolution #114."
If North Korea has nuclear weapons, why aren't we invading them first?
Uh…hello…isn't that the point?
European leaders are against the war.
Only America was attacked. And besides, except for the tantrums of France, Belgium and Germany, only three European nations aren't willing to defend freedom. The entire rest of Europe is with America.
The French don't support the war.
Oh…did they surrender already?
Germany objects to this war.
Germany objected to Reagan's "attitude" towards the Soviet Union as well. They objected to our presence in 1943 as well.
USSR doesn't support the war.
They are still angry over Reagan's brilliant Cold War victory.
But the UN is the world's most respected governing body.
Not as respected as the US military.
America has always waited until enemies attacked.
Now that oceans can't hold back enemies, pre-emptive war is forever a necessity.
War will cost billions!
So…how much is YOUR city worth?
President Bush says he's willing to violate the 1976 executive order forbidding assassinations of foreign leaders.
As soon as the ink is dry on rescinding that idiotic order, will someone please pull the trigger? The line forms to the right…
Tom Daschle says George Bush has a "credibility gap"
When was the last time we came to Tom Daschle for the truth???
These problems didn't happen under Clinton.
Actually, they happened. But Clinton ignored them. Now, Bush will clean up his mess.
Bush 1st should have taken out Hussein in '91.
That 1991 UN resolution forbade a march on Baghdad. Remember?
Millions of peace activists are demanding we stop the war.
Millions of Iraqi's are begging for us to start the war.
Thousands of innocents will be killed or injured.
That's a lot less than Hussein has killed and is killing right now.
(Of course, there's only one man that needs to be killed…)
Young Americans will die in battle.
Would you prefer they die in skyscrapers?
Protesters have genuine objections to war
Just like they did in Somalia? Bosnia?
People are coming from all over the world to act as "human shields".
Quick, hurry, before the bombs start dropping…
This is about American Imperialism.
So which country do we own? What nation sends us their tax dollars? If America was imperialist, we'd already own the entire world including Kuwait oil. Who could stand in our way?
This is Blood for Oil
The only blood is the Iraqi people tortured, starved and killed while Hussein builds massive palaces to hide nuclear weapons…all financed with Iraqi oil.
An attack on Iraq could seriously undermine and destabilize Arab nations.
Destabilize the region? Like they're stable now. Where is 90% of the worlds trouble come from ? The sooner we topple these oppressive 14th century terrorist regimes the better.
Are we prepared for a multi-billion dollar occupation?
Were we prepared to liberate Europe and Japan in 1945? South Korea in 1953? Grenada? El Salvador? Kuwait? The Eastern Bloc? Afghanistan?
Nations always love Americans when we rescue them from tyranny. The price of freedom is never free.
Polls show Americans are more concerned about the threat from al Qaeda than from Iraq.
It's not a war against Al Qaeda. It's not a war against Iraq. It's a war against terrorism. Anywhere we find it. One nation at a time.
American opinion is against the war.
No, it's not. A majority of Americans want to fight now, not later. You should not get all your info from your TV
According to a recent poll…
You know what? Screw those polls. We're in a war against terrorism. If you don't want to fight the *******s, get the hell out of the way. Go visit Paris. Or Antwerp. Or Berlin. Or Moscow. And stay there. Forever. But this time, don't call us when the Visigoths are at the gates.
Use this handy guide to tell you which snappy answer to give whenever a liberal uses their stupid soundbytes to help Saddam Hussein.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States is taking unilateral action against Iraq!
So far, it's a 90-member worldwide "unilateral" coalition.
We are in a rush to war.
An 11-year rush?
Tough inspections can disarm Saddam Hussein without invading Iraq.
11 years of inspections have done wonders so far.
We should let the inspectors finish their job.
We did. They didn't. We will.
Why fight? The Iraqi military is weaker than in 1991.
But their biological weapons and chemical weapons are much more dangerous.
If we invade, Saddam Hussein might use those weapons of mass destruction against us.
I thought you said Iraq didn't have them?
But terrorists might attack if we invade Iraq.
Oh…so if we don't attack Iraq, terrorists will never strike again?
We shouldn't go to war without a UN resolution.
ANOTHER resolution? What about the last 16 resolutions? Shall we use them as wallpaper? Or shall we use the same resolutions Bill Clinton used in Bosnia?
We don't have a real declaration for war.
It's called "Joint Congressional Resolution #114."
If North Korea has nuclear weapons, why aren't we invading them first?
Uh…hello…isn't that the point?
European leaders are against the war.
Only America was attacked. And besides, except for the tantrums of France, Belgium and Germany, only three European nations aren't willing to defend freedom. The entire rest of Europe is with America.
The French don't support the war.
Oh…did they surrender already?
Germany objects to this war.
Germany objected to Reagan's "attitude" towards the Soviet Union as well. They objected to our presence in 1943 as well.
USSR doesn't support the war.
They are still angry over Reagan's brilliant Cold War victory.
But the UN is the world's most respected governing body.
Not as respected as the US military.
America has always waited until enemies attacked.
Now that oceans can't hold back enemies, pre-emptive war is forever a necessity.
War will cost billions!
So…how much is YOUR city worth?
President Bush says he's willing to violate the 1976 executive order forbidding assassinations of foreign leaders.
As soon as the ink is dry on rescinding that idiotic order, will someone please pull the trigger? The line forms to the right…
Tom Daschle says George Bush has a "credibility gap"
When was the last time we came to Tom Daschle for the truth???
These problems didn't happen under Clinton.
Actually, they happened. But Clinton ignored them. Now, Bush will clean up his mess.
Bush 1st should have taken out Hussein in '91.
That 1991 UN resolution forbade a march on Baghdad. Remember?
Millions of peace activists are demanding we stop the war.
Millions of Iraqi's are begging for us to start the war.
Thousands of innocents will be killed or injured.
That's a lot less than Hussein has killed and is killing right now.
(Of course, there's only one man that needs to be killed…)
Young Americans will die in battle.
Would you prefer they die in skyscrapers?
Protesters have genuine objections to war
Just like they did in Somalia? Bosnia?
People are coming from all over the world to act as "human shields".
Quick, hurry, before the bombs start dropping…
This is about American Imperialism.
So which country do we own? What nation sends us their tax dollars? If America was imperialist, we'd already own the entire world including Kuwait oil. Who could stand in our way?
This is Blood for Oil
The only blood is the Iraqi people tortured, starved and killed while Hussein builds massive palaces to hide nuclear weapons…all financed with Iraqi oil.
An attack on Iraq could seriously undermine and destabilize Arab nations.
Destabilize the region? Like they're stable now. Where is 90% of the worlds trouble come from ? The sooner we topple these oppressive 14th century terrorist regimes the better.
Are we prepared for a multi-billion dollar occupation?
Were we prepared to liberate Europe and Japan in 1945? South Korea in 1953? Grenada? El Salvador? Kuwait? The Eastern Bloc? Afghanistan?
Nations always love Americans when we rescue them from tyranny. The price of freedom is never free.
Polls show Americans are more concerned about the threat from al Qaeda than from Iraq.
It's not a war against Al Qaeda. It's not a war against Iraq. It's a war against terrorism. Anywhere we find it. One nation at a time.
American opinion is against the war.
No, it's not. A majority of Americans want to fight now, not later. You should not get all your info from your TV
According to a recent poll…
You know what? Screw those polls. We're in a war against terrorism. If you don't want to fight the *******s, get the hell out of the way. Go visit Paris. Or Antwerp. Or Berlin. Or Moscow. And stay there. Forever. But this time, don't call us when the Visigoths are at the gates.