400ex a-arms

[exboy400]

i have a 400ex and i want to buy some a-arms that are +2 +1 or even +3 +1 but i dont want to pay a ton of money for them. if anyone has any suggestions can you include the company, place where i can buy them from, and how much they are. thanks.

[bluebaron]

burgard .... $400.....try ebay

[exboy400]

for the 400ex burgard only makes them in +2 +0 or +3 and i kinda want that +1 forward.

[Derek]

Originally posted by exboy400
for the 400ex burgard only makes them in +2 +0 or +3 and i kinda want that +1 forward.

its gonna move your center of gravity making your front end go up off of jumps.

[QuadTrix6]

Originally posted by Derek
its gonna move your center of gravity making your front end go up off of jumps.

yes i would not go +1 fwd IMO

[ralph2]

i went with +2 +1 a arms on my blaster and they are awsome, but the blaster is a whole dfferent quad, that has a short wheelbase to begin with, i dont know if you would want to go +1 forward on an ex, cause i think it has a perfect balance as it is,,, i wouldnt risdk throughing it off

[Ralph]

dont go +1 foward

[RiPPiNiTuP7]

Originally posted by Lrd Mx400ex
dont go +1 foward

Agreed.

[440 pumpkin]

I disagree.
Some people suggest not going with the +1 due to wheel base.
They say it makes the front end lighter and it wheelies out of corners. I disagree, but I'm not and engineer. I think the T pin front ends are +1 f.

[YLW400]

Every "big" name manufacturer I looked at for long travel +3 a-arms only offered 3+1....That kinda tells me something. Roll, JRD,Gibson......and on and on

[exboy400]

thanks for the info.........you just made my decision a whole lot easier.

[YLW400]

So, what is your decision? To go 3+0, or 3+1?

[exboy400]

i think i am just gunna do some burgard +2 a-arms because i dont want to have to get new, longer brake lines......with the +2's all i will have to do is unhook them......and burgard are a little cheaper then most other companies.