Burgard +3 a-arms

[Team Outlaw #34]

I don't know jack crap about a-arms and handling....

so would burgard +3 a-arms not handle very well? should i just get +2's? and if i got +3's what wuold i have to do to keep the width under 50 inches?

thanks for the help....

oh yeah and if anyone has bugard +2 or +3's let me know how yo like them....

[Team Outlaw #34]

....

[Dave400ex]

For a 400ex they suggest +2 a-arms, unless you are going to get the +3 and then 4:1 rims, or +3 in a LT setup with 4:1 rims.

[oj250r]

here are my +3 and i love them....they turn sharper than +2.....jmo...

[d-14 rider 27]

dang oj250r, looks like you gotta give arens a call. your frame is a lil twisted it looks like. as far as burgard a-arms go, burgard, jb, jd, laeger, lsr, herrmann, its all the same ***** imo. they all use the same design, just some got the castor adjustment, and some got gussets in different places. i had burgards on my ex, i like them, but i went to long travel. and for the record, i have plus 3 herrmanns with stock rims, and im not close to 50 inches. 3+2 offset, or stock will work.

[KandK952]

that might just be the ground level that he is on and the shocks make it look that way. anyway, go with +3, the wider the better handling. and you will be under 50. (real close)

[oj250r]

Originally posted by d-14 rider 27
dang oj250r, looks like you gotta give arens a call. your frame is a lil twisted it looks like


where at??

[Team Outlaw #34]

I think i see it too....the shock mounts don't line up....but its probly just me....

[Red Rooster]

I don't think its bent..... The bumper is bent and the quad is sitting crooked so it kinda looks like the top of the frame is bent, but its just an optical ilusion.

[Pappy]

its the pic...mine looks the same...lmao

[Dave400ex]

Yeah it's just the picture his 250 isn't level...