blaster or warrior?

[chads300]

im debating on a blaster or wrrior i like to trail ride,jump,hillclimb and drag race any opinions woukld be nice,thanks

[mxblastermx]

The warrior is more of a trail quad some mud mostly just trails.The blaster sounds like it would be best for you as long as you dont plan on hitting any big mud.

[keglassg]

well if you are plannin on hill climbing i would def go with the warrior, they are made more for that. your blaster is your typical 2-stroke and you gotta have it revved way up to get an bottom end power out of it, the warrior had more torque than its good for so its much better for hill climbing on the motor side, besides the fact that the blasters are a shorter wheel base and the front end comes up really easily on the hills. i like the blasters, but the warrior is more versatile for me. i drag race and barrel race, i hill climb and trail ride and just about everything else you can think of and i do it all on my warrior. for mx, i wont argue at all that the blaster would typically be a better machine for a small guy, but im a little bigger and dont do mx so the warrior suits me just fine. hope i helped.

[chads300]

ok now heres another question i have access to many blaster mods for cheap(ct pipe,v-force rreeds, filter,carb) if i do some work to the blasty will it holld its own on the hills w/ 4 strokes like my 300ex?

[mxblastermx]

add a little longer swinger and yes it will,banshee's own at hills and there 2 strokes a blaster with a +3 swinger would be great

[keglassg]

i cant see why it wouldnt, like i said you just have to keep the rpm's up, no crawling lol, but yeah i would def get a little length to it first, they are realllllllllly short. add 2 or 3 inches and it'll help.

[chads300]

ok were do i find a swinger for a fairly cheap price? also how is the relaibility of the blaster?

[chads300]

lol i know banshees own at hills i just got rid ofmy baby!:(

[chads300]

my baby

[mxblastermx]

there's an ebay store that sells brand new swingers in any lengh id get a plus 3 for hills but there 200 with bearings

[chads300]

ok yeah im lookin at either a 92 blasty fr $800 or an 88 warrior fr$1400

[mxblastermx]

get the blaster its cheaper and newer

[chads300]

ok i know this is dumb but what is faster mod for mod and i think ima go wit the blasty

[mxblastermx]

Ive owned both and i have a national built blaster right now and i know for a fact mod for the mod the blaster is wayy faster and the aftermarket parts are alot easier to obtain

[chads300]

you wouldnt happen to have any spare aftermarket parts would you?

[mxblastermx]

a few little things,front billet wheel spacers,new 18in turf tamers,pro taper bars powdercoated black,ummm idk what else id have to look

[chads300]

would you sell this stuff?

[mxblastermx]

yep ill get a list of everything i have tomorrow

[keglassg]

hey chads if you arent interested in the pro-tapers let me know, i might be intereted in buying them from him, but im not gonna under cut you buddy.

[chads300]

well i picked the blasty up it is actually in decent shape/verry tight for a 92, im going to tear it down and build it up so ile post pics of the build!

[mxblastermx]

post some pics of it as it is

[86250rrider]

Originally posted by keglassg
well if you are plannin on hill climbing i would def go with the warrior, they are made more for that. your blaster is your typical 2-stroke and you gotta have it revved way up to get an bottom end power out of it, the warrior had more torque than its good for so its much better for hill climbing on the motor side, besides the fact that the blasters are a shorter wheel base and the front end comes up really easily on the hills. i like the blasters, but the warrior is more versatile for me. i drag race and barrel race, i hill climb and trail ride and just about everything else you can think of and i do it all on my warrior. for mx, i wont argue at all that the blaster would typically be a better machine for a small guy, but im a little bigger and dont do mx so the warrior suits me just fine. hope i helped.



i like the line : you gotta rev it up to get any bottom end power out of it !!! a blaster has excellent bottom end for a little motor. warriors handle horribly. i think the wooden box they are shipped in probably would handle better.:D

[mxblastermx]

any 2 stoke has good bottom end really,warriors i think personally are boring

[keglassg]

well let me know when thinking starts payin ya good lol, i wasnt insulting the blaster dude, all i said was you gotta have it revved up to have any real torque. its a 2-stroke, most of them are that way including the blaster, so chill

[chads300]

b