PDA

View Full Version : +2+3 or +3+2 on +2 a arms.



Sparks425Ex
12-27-2002, 09:23 AM
I run only MX and I am getting new a arms in a few days. Houser +2s. Well I have heard stock is 4:1 and +3+2. No on really knows.

If +3+2 is stock then I planned on going to +2+3.

Is this a bad idea. Will it give to much bumpsteer?

Lets see some pics of+3+2 and +2+3. Also tell what they are.

400MXer
12-27-2002, 12:08 PM
go with 3-2,

and the stock offset is like 3.5-1.5 or something like that.

i've got +2 a arms witht the 3-2 offset wheels and they are good.

2-3 is really almost like flipping your rims around...one of my friends has his rims flipped.....and another has 2-3 wheels, They both have trouble with tierods bending. Because it puts more pressure on your spindle.

And i also assume that it increases bumpsteer.

DEAL
12-27-2002, 06:15 PM
:huh

jb400exxx
12-27-2002, 08:10 PM
i have my stock fronts flipped, and i have hit some things really hard and i haven't bent anything. and i really have no idea what bump steer even is, but i know it handles sweet. it's so stable.

QuadRacer041
12-28-2002, 05:12 AM
3+2 means that the inside is 3 and the put side is 2, 2+3 is the oppisite. most people run 3+2 on +2 a arms, it should bring you out to about 48-49" wide.2+3 will make you wider but give you alot of bump steer, the furthe out your offset is the more bump steer you will have, in other words 4+1 will handle the best and 2+3 will be the worst.

12-28-2002, 05:16 AM
stock is like 3.5:1.5 and i havent found a company that makes that so buy 3:2 or new stock fronts. I have the 2:3 now but when i get new a arms soon i will be getting new front rims to. Heres a pic.