Whats Skinnier? stock 400ex or +2 burgard

[AGPallstar109]

hey hows it going im going from MX to XC so im getting rid of my +2 LT 400x a-arms to either buy a set of Burgard +2 +1 300ex a-arms, or a chrome set of stock length 400ex a-arms that have caster and camber adjustments, and i want to be real skinny so which one is skinnier thanks for any and all help

[sparks427]

to be honest i think their about the same, i'm thinkin stock 400ex a-arms are about 2in wider. check out this thread http://www.exriders.com/vbb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=344223&highlight=300ex+aarms it has alot of stuff in it and i remember some talk about a-arms by me and few other guys so you might find ur answer there. otherwise i'd say do some searchin round the site i know the answer is on here. good luck.

[bwamos]

400ex stock width a-arms are about +1-3/4" wider so the 400ex setup will be a little narrower than the +2" arms.. assuming the +2's are actually +2". Usually a nominal value.

[SET THE STAGE]

i think 400 arms are actually only about +1.25 or 1.5

either way, +2 would be wider