250r rider 88
03-22-2008, 06:37 PM
ok i did some searching and still cant find the straight forward answer im looking for so hopefully someone can help me out here:
my r with stock a arms sat at 44" wide, now i believe the wheels are 3+2, does this sound correct?
if i were to run +1 a arms and 4+1 hipers i would still be at 44 correct?
if i were to run +2 a arms with 4+1 hipers that would put me at 46"?
my thinkin on this is i can get a set of plus 2 a arms easier and cheaper than +1s i just dont want it to be too wide in the trail, so if i can be at 46 i think this would be ok
let me know if my thinkin here is correct or not and your guy's suggestions
thanks
my r with stock a arms sat at 44" wide, now i believe the wheels are 3+2, does this sound correct?
if i were to run +1 a arms and 4+1 hipers i would still be at 44 correct?
if i were to run +2 a arms with 4+1 hipers that would put me at 46"?
my thinkin on this is i can get a set of plus 2 a arms easier and cheaper than +1s i just dont want it to be too wide in the trail, so if i can be at 46 i think this would be ok
let me know if my thinkin here is correct or not and your guy's suggestions
thanks