CT350 Non PV or PV

[stumpy]

I am strongly considering going with a CT 350 jug. Does anyone have or know how radically different the non -pv is compared to the PV. How do CT exhaust fair up. They have a mid-range and PV pipe. I currently have a ESR TRX5 centermount.

[cdrookie]

big difference in pv vs non pv as far as power delivery, but with everything else being the same, hp will be practically the same. i have a ct midrange, and on my 310 it's pretty smooth, but it has a larger dia stinger and the only silencer i have for it is an fmf turbine core 2 so that probably kills a little power.

[doc-bones]

The TRX5 pipe is way better than CT mid pipe! I have ran both. Other pipes that will work good is LRD bigbore, the best pipe, if you can find one is Curtis Sparks big bore tt. I have had 350 pv and non pv motors HP is similiar, however, pv hits right away and is smooth all the way up to top end.

[stumpy]

Thanks a bunch for replies!!

[wilkin250r]

Cripes almighty. My 340 can be downright difficult to ride in tight terrain, I am forever losing traction. It's got a powervalve on it, I can't imagine how bad it would be if the power came on faster.


On those big engines, unless you are in the dunes (where wheelspin is just a fact of life), I would ALWAYS recommend a powervalve.

[stumpy]

Yee Haw point taken!! This bike is only ridden on sand, so I quess this is a no brainer decision.

[707trx250r]

pv is the way to go

ct has a strong set up as far as the 350pv goes. Also most engine builders like the ct pv over the esr pv. It operates a little smoother.

I have the ct kit and it totally rips

[Eddiesanders250]

Just because you ride in the sand doesnt mean you shouldnt buy a powervalve. I strongly recommend a PV in the sand. I only ride the sand and am running a ct350pv. It is the smoothest 250 i have ever ridden. I am always using lowend in the sand to say you dont use lowend is rediculous.