View Full Version : aviation fuel vs. u-4........and stage-2 vs 208
buck naked-r
11-09-2007, 06:12 PM
here's the dyno testing from today.............not back for a stock bore and stroke
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o101/buck450/DSCF0078.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o101/buck450/DSCF0077.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o101/buck450/DSCF0076.jpg
buck naked-r
11-10-2007, 06:59 PM
i'll be trying for 65hp next week without going in the engine
XCpred
11-11-2007, 07:32 PM
is that 100 low lead? I work at a small airport but never wanted to run that in my bike because i was affraid it would hurt something.
250r4life
11-11-2007, 08:49 PM
Originally posted by XCpred
is that 100 low lead? I work at a small airport but never wanted to run that in my bike because i was affraid it would hurt something.
i and all my buddies have been running it for years
yfz450admirer
11-11-2007, 11:20 PM
Impressive numbers
mcleod
11-12-2007, 09:07 AM
100LL is not bad for engine, only for catalytic converter and o2 sensor on street car.
great number :)
killroy
11-12-2007, 10:39 AM
would you reccommend 100LL in a stock engine with just a hotcam? I can obtain this easier then regular gas cause I fly more then i drive
mcleod
11-12-2007, 04:08 PM
if you pay less for it yeah, if it cost more! dont spend that money in that! it doesnt worth it.
killroy
11-13-2007, 08:43 PM
Originally posted by mcleod
if you pay less for it yeah, if it cost more! dont spend that money in that! it doesnt worth it. yah..it def cost more
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.1 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.