PDA

View Full Version : aviation fuel vs. u-4........and stage-2 vs 208



buck naked-r
11-09-2007, 06:12 PM
here's the dyno testing from today.............not back for a stock bore and stroke

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o101/buck450/DSCF0078.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o101/buck450/DSCF0077.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o101/buck450/DSCF0076.jpg

buck naked-r
11-10-2007, 06:59 PM
i'll be trying for 65hp next week without going in the engine

XCpred
11-11-2007, 07:32 PM
is that 100 low lead? I work at a small airport but never wanted to run that in my bike because i was affraid it would hurt something.

250r4life
11-11-2007, 08:49 PM
Originally posted by XCpred
is that 100 low lead? I work at a small airport but never wanted to run that in my bike because i was affraid it would hurt something.

i and all my buddies have been running it for years

yfz450admirer
11-11-2007, 11:20 PM
Impressive numbers

mcleod
11-12-2007, 09:07 AM
100LL is not bad for engine, only for catalytic converter and o2 sensor on street car.

great number :)

killroy
11-12-2007, 10:39 AM
would you reccommend 100LL in a stock engine with just a hotcam? I can obtain this easier then regular gas cause I fly more then i drive

mcleod
11-12-2007, 04:08 PM
if you pay less for it yeah, if it cost more! dont spend that money in that! it doesnt worth it.

killroy
11-13-2007, 08:43 PM
Originally posted by mcleod
if you pay less for it yeah, if it cost more! dont spend that money in that! it doesnt worth it. yah..it def cost more