PDA

View Full Version : 1000th post



Cr85rRida
08-20-2007, 12:07 PM
cool

http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k250/morrison1952/scan0005.jpg

Robin Hood
08-20-2007, 12:19 PM
Very cool. :devil:

mineralgrey01gt
08-20-2007, 12:27 PM
more people need to get 1000 post :)

BlaineKaiser450
08-20-2007, 12:43 PM
Originally posted by Robin Hood
Very cool. :devil: yes very;)

trx400EXtreme
08-20-2007, 12:44 PM
i wish my 1000th post could have been that cool:( :devil:

DVXracer
08-20-2007, 12:56 PM
Originally posted by mineralgrey01gt
more people need to get 1000 post :)

I avioded posting mine.

73watermutt
08-20-2007, 01:07 PM
I do not see how you guys get the time to post so much. For me between my kids, work, racing and just riding I get very little time to be on the net.

JOEX
08-20-2007, 01:09 PM
Originally posted by 73watermutt
I do not see how you guys get the time to post so much. For me between my kids, work, racing and just riding I get very little time to be on the net.
That's because you have a life;) :D :p

400EXtreme
08-20-2007, 01:14 PM
its takin me forever to reach 1k

Scro
08-20-2007, 01:23 PM
No, you have it all wrong...you are supposed to post women in short skirts for your 1000th post:rolleyes:

JOEX
08-20-2007, 01:24 PM
Originally posted by Scro
No, you have it all wrong...you are supposed to post women in short skirts for your 1000th post:rolleyes:
:devious:

smr
08-20-2007, 01:26 PM
Originally posted by Scro
No, you have it all wrong...you are supposed to post women in short skirts for your 1000th post:rolleyes:

whew..glad to know that wasn't a woman. I just noticed the skirt and thought...she sure is ugley.....:D

trx400EXtreme
08-20-2007, 01:48 PM
Originally posted by JOEX
:devious: ur mean:devil:

wilkin250r
08-20-2007, 02:02 PM
Worst 1000th post thread EVER....

mx825
08-20-2007, 02:04 PM
Originally posted by Scro
No, you have it all wrong...you are supposed to post women in short skirts for your 1000th post:rolleyes:



:devil:

JRP
08-20-2007, 02:12 PM
Originally posted by wilkin250r
Worst 1000th post thread EVER....

x2

Raptor68
08-20-2007, 02:19 PM
It WAS actually really good, until he felt it necessary to change the pic! :mad:

DVXracer
08-20-2007, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by JOEX
:devious:


hahaha nice work.

Cr85rRida
08-20-2007, 02:34 PM
rawr i didnt change it



it wasent that bad mods, no nudity:confused:

JOEX
08-20-2007, 03:18 PM
Originally posted by Cr85rRida
rawr i didnt change it



it wasent that bad mods, no nudity:confused:
Just messing with you;)

Beware the next 1000th post poster:devil: :devil: :devil:

ZeroLogic
08-20-2007, 03:43 PM
Just because its your birthday doesn't mean you have to take down hot pictures!:p

Cr85rRida
08-20-2007, 04:15 PM
Originally posted by JOEX
Just messing with you;)

Beware the next 1000th post poster:devil: :devil: :devil:

lol its not a problem,every one is allowed to have fun....even if their OLD:blah:

DVXracer
08-20-2007, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by Cr85rRida
lol its not a problem,every one is allowed to have fun....even if their OLD:blah:

ouch

fastyz85
08-20-2007, 04:33 PM
give me three or four more post and i'll have mine.:D

BlaineKaiser450
08-20-2007, 04:50 PM
Originally posted by Cr85rRida
lol its not a problem,every one is allowed to have fun....even if their OLD:blah: need a little aloe (sp?) for that burn?

fastyz85
08-20-2007, 05:06 PM
Originally posted by BlaineKaiser450
need a little aloe (sp?) for that burn?

haha

mineralgrey01gt
08-20-2007, 05:08 PM
i was wondering what happened to the pic :(

JOEX
08-20-2007, 05:32 PM
Originally posted by Cr85rRida
lol its not a problem,every one is allowed to have fun....even if their OLD:blah:
Yea, i'm old:( Old enough to be your dad;)

Who knows, maybe I am:blah: :devil:

Cr85rRida
08-20-2007, 06:47 PM
Originally posted by JOEX
Yea, i'm old:( Old enough to be your dad;)

Who knows, maybe I am:blah: :devil:


please, we all know you got 1 big hairy beaver in your life time from the other thread, but it surely wasent my mother.;) :p

JOEX
08-20-2007, 09:10 PM
Originally posted by Cr85rRida
please, we all know you got 1 big hairy beaver in your life time from the other thread, but it surely wasent my mother.;) :p
I'm not sure what to say about that:huh :p

Ghost-Rider
08-20-2007, 09:17 PM
Wheres the girls ?:chinese:

DVXracer
08-20-2007, 09:18 PM
Originally posted by JOEX
I'm not sure what to say about that:huh :p

If you were the one who edited my post in the other "1000th post" .... touche, it was pretty damn funny hahah

JOEX
08-20-2007, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by DVXracer
If you were the one who edited my post in the other "1000th post" .... touche, it was pretty damn funny hahah
:chinese:
FIFTH AMENDMENT [U.S. Constitution] - 'No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.'

The Fifth Amendment 'can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory; and it protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used.' Kastigar v. U.S., 406 U.S. 441, 44-45 ('72). A reasonable belief that information concerning income or assets might be used to establish criminal failure to file a tax return can support a claim of Fifth Amendment privilege. See U.S. v. Rendahl, 746 F.2d 553, 55-56 (9th Cir.'84).

The only way the Fifth Amendment can be asserted as to testimony is on a question-by-question basis. Rendahl, 746 F.2d at 555, citing with approval U.S. v. Bell, 448 F.2d 40, 42 (9th Cir.'71) (Fifth Amendment challenge premature on appeal from enforcement order; appellant must present himself for questioning after enforcement and as to each question elect to raise or not to raise the defense).

The appropriate device for compelling answers to incriminating questions is a government grant of use immunity. See Sharp, 920 F.2d at 1172.

DVXracer
08-20-2007, 09:27 PM
Originally posted by JOEX
:chinese:
FIFTH AMENDMENT [U.S. Constitution] - 'No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.'

The Fifth Amendment 'can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory; and it protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used.' Kastigar v. U.S., 406 U.S. 441, 44-45 ('72). A reasonable belief that information concerning income or assets might be used to establish criminal failure to file a tax return can support a claim of Fifth Amendment privilege. See U.S. v. Rendahl, 746 F.2d 553, 55-56 (9th Cir.'84).

The only way the Fifth Amendment can be asserted as to testimony is on a question-by-question basis. Rendahl, 746 F.2d at 555, citing with approval U.S. v. Bell, 448 F.2d 40, 42 (9th Cir.'71) (Fifth Amendment challenge premature on appeal from enforcement order; appellant must present himself for questioning after enforcement and as to each question elect to raise or not to raise the defense).

The appropriate device for compelling answers to incriminating questions is a government grant of use immunity. See Sharp, 920 F.2d at 1172.

Wow thanks for making me read all that :ermm: :p

Ghost-Rider
08-20-2007, 09:27 PM
LoL @ the doll !!!

Robin Hood
08-20-2007, 10:12 PM
He's just feeling extra administrative since it's his birthday. :p

Don't worry, it should pass by tomorrow. Haha

Cr85rRida
08-20-2007, 11:15 PM
id say this wasent a bad 1000th post after all:muscle:

07250ex
08-20-2007, 11:35 PM
883rd post =p

Cr85rRida
08-21-2007, 12:53 PM
Originally posted by 07250ex
883rd post =p

lol almost there