+3+1 or +3+0's for 400ex

[forum]

long travel that is.
do you recomend lobo 2 +3+1's
or houser +3+0's

Not specifiacaly the arms just the measurments

[Sparks425Ex]

Get the +3,+0 Housers. If you go 1 inch forward on dthe 400Ex it makes it handle and jump funny. It makes teh center of gravity farther up near teh front which makes the front end go up when you are in the air. This is not that same as adding a +11/4 Swing Arm. even tho you are makign it longer. Get the normal length then get a longer swing arm.

[forum]

perfect i have a =1.25 swing arm
thanks

[Derek]

yea dont go with +3+1. just keep it the same and get +3 +0

[Mxbubs]

Yeah, like they said.

3+0 on the front end.

I got +1 on the swingarm, and it is ENOUGH, I dont think I would like 1.25, the front end is already hard enough to get up on this +1.

I got the Herrmann's +3's, they are better and cheaper than the houser's or the Roll's. He doesnt use a male studded ball joint on the top arm. The stud will break or bend for sure.

I paid $600 for my arms, and 1000$ for my shocks!

(But that was way back when Brad was first getting started.)

[Juggalo]

i've always heard go longer on the swingarm and also go 1 forward in front and it makes your center of gravity like perfect

[Mxbubs]

The herrmanns.

[Nausty]

I would go with houser out of those choices, but if I were you i'd go with leager I think or hermann.

[QuadRacer041]

this is the way it works,
longer swingarm = heavier front end
longer a arms(or +1) = heavier rear end

im my opinion the 400ex is already too rear end heavy, i would go with a longer swing arm and a +0 set of a arms.

[forum]

ok perfect. thanks guys. Know if only i can get people to give me good answers on the crf450 conversion ex V.S. the C-dale.

I feel like a jackass calling jeff just to ask him about his quad even tho he told me to.