PDA

View Full Version : comparison:HMF sport and HMF ironman...



trx400EXtreme
06-21-2007, 05:30 PM
i was just wanting to know how much better (if any at all) the HMF ironman s/o is compared to the HMF sport s/o. thanx in advance!

Sparky_20
06-21-2007, 05:37 PM
the iron man probably costs more. My sport series s/o kicks @$$. good bottom to midrange performance plus its loud

XXXRACER165
06-21-2007, 06:07 PM
Lmao loud isn't good

atvhonda-rider
06-21-2007, 06:33 PM
XXXracer, is all you do is flame? every post i see is you flamin somebody, you think you kno alot but ive seen your threads, you dont even have a decent exhaust for your "monster" 440... ANYWAYS HMF ironman is definately more expensive but it might give different power ranges, either way if its just the slip-on go sport, save money, still get the great performance and sound.... oh and by the way, i installed my full system HMF sport today, KICKS ***** and sounds GREAT!

LT250_JOE
06-21-2007, 07:21 PM
HMF LOVES TO SHOW DYNO CHARTS, JUST EMAIL THEM OR GO TO THEIR WEB SITE AND ASK FOR A COMPARISON/ DYNO SHEET.

trx400EXtreme
06-21-2007, 07:28 PM
alright, thanx everybody.

TWISTED DINLI
06-21-2007, 08:37 PM
HMF's website says that the ironman series is designed for more mid range and top end.

300ex mxracer
06-22-2007, 10:24 AM
i think the ironman is more for mx- mid to top end power. the sport is for all around riding.

yfz450rida
06-25-2007, 04:50 PM
i have personnally rode the sports series and ironman on both a 450r and yfz and the sports series is more of a bottom-mid and the iron man is a national pipe making it mid-top it is flat out top end power. for tight technical track a sports series will benifit with it power based in the low to mid. just my $.02