PDA

View Full Version : going from fatty to paul turner RACE



86250rrider
12-23-2006, 06:07 PM
im getting a pt race and want people who used both to compare power delivery of these pipes.hope its worth the change. it rips now:macho

pimpt250r
12-23-2006, 07:24 PM
well i went from a fmf fatty with a sms silencer to a pt type 6 and a fatboy and i would have to tell ya,,,it is the best woods pipe out there for the 250r ,,,
im sure there race pipe is top notch as well
im sure the only reason more people dont run em is cost

Gregjy
12-24-2006, 01:50 AM
You will love it. I just did went to a paul turner eliminator and will never look at an FMF again... MUCH better... Strong mid and top pull.......

cincy250R
12-24-2006, 11:42 AM
the paul turner is the ****.....

-Dave

86250rrider
12-24-2006, 11:59 AM
the dyno shows even more torque than the sparks mx with like one less hp. peak. that was on other sites pipe shootout with 250r pipes.i cant wait. it is very strong now ...borderline goofy with the fatty.and its gonna get even meaner...i love it ! im gonna have to use mudlites on the back!!!!!!!

deathman53
12-24-2006, 03:56 PM
I have a paul turner hi-rev on my atc250r, its far better than the fmf fatty and better than the esr atc5 I had on it. Cost is the reason why many don't use a paul turner pipe, for most people.....$300 for a un-chromed pipe is ridiculas, they would rather buy a chrome fmf for about $200.

Eddiesanders250
12-24-2006, 04:03 PM
JMO and maybe many others, the fmf pipe looks like chit...... its got that weird looking hump in it.

86250rrider
12-29-2006, 11:37 PM
paul turner midrange vs. stock

86250rrider
12-29-2006, 11:43 PM
sparks mx

86250rrider
12-30-2006, 12:03 AM
fatty

86250rrider
12-30-2006, 12:11 AM
by the way ...the rpm scale was set wrong so the rpms listed must be multiplied by 2.:D the paul turner and sparks are really close. the dip in the curve on paul turner and sparks was attribued to an overly rich main jet.had they been rejetted it would have smoothed out.thats coming from the site.

juanki
12-30-2006, 10:55 AM
why are two diferent runs?

.004 vs
.002

.007 vs
.01

86250rrider
12-30-2006, 11:10 AM
sorry... i dont understand english;)

juanki
12-30-2006, 11:21 AM
Originally posted by 86250rrider
sorry... i dont understand english;)

I DONT UNDERSTAND YOUR POST

i dont think that you are a racist pr**k for that coment;)

what i try to ask is that why are two graphics, two results,

i remember reading that article before, it was posted here ( the link )

can you post the link.

86250rrider
12-30-2006, 11:43 AM
ok ....let me make this soo simple an irishman can understand it!!! they dynoed each pipe one time and overlayed the results for comparison.001 is 1st pipe, 002 is second,003 is third ,and so on.there is even an overlay of them all together.pretty cool.at least thats the opinion of this drunken R riding non-ethnically sensitive irishman!!:D

juanki
12-30-2006, 12:17 PM
ok got it, so they put in the results the hig and low?

86250rrider
12-30-2006, 12:29 PM
uhhhh...ok:rolleyes:

86250rrider
01-02-2007, 04:54 PM
the pipe mounted up nicely. i went from a 13 tooth front sprocket to a 14 just to put the pipe to the test on its first run.well... it has more $hit down low,more $hit in the middle,and more $hit up top. and thats with taller gearing to boot. I AM VERY HAPPY WITH THIS SETUP :D