Log in

View Full Version : +2 or +3



buildingup
09-20-2006, 07:53 AM
i'm starting to look for a 05 450r and was wondering which arms are better with handling and all that with a long travel set up...i'd be using the quad on some MX, trails, and dunes...just looking for something that handles well and can take hard landings...thanks guys

tltcracing
09-20-2006, 11:56 AM
the length realy doesnt mater about hard landings. i would say go as wide as the line you are looking at has. more stable.

buildingup
09-20-2006, 12:30 PM
how about handleing though? i know the +3 would be more stable on cornering but is it that much better then the +2 or is it better to just stick with +2

DieselBoy
09-20-2006, 01:33 PM
obviously the wider the more stable. for trails, you don't want it to be too wide or you'll be hookin trees.

tltcracing
09-20-2006, 03:36 PM
thats the other thing, cant go too wide b/c of trails. go as wide as you think you can fit in the trails.

MAD450r
09-20-2006, 04:37 PM
I had +2 burgards. They handled great for me with my derisi rebuilds. I am know in the process of switching to +2.5 lonestar racing standard travels to use with my derisi rebuilds.

I wantd the +2.5 to make the front the same width as my rearend is with my G-force +3 axle.