PDA

View Full Version : redneck lotto winner



insaneracin2003
06-19-2006, 10:43 AM
leave it to them...lol

trick250r
06-19-2006, 10:45 AM
thats some high class stuff right there... yup yup :bandit:

400 SS EX
06-19-2006, 10:57 AM
I'd prolly do the same thing!! Would be kinda cool.

06-19-2006, 10:59 AM
LOL...:blah:

ohsobad_chevy
06-19-2006, 11:18 AM
Shhhiiiiitt.... I'd pimp it. :blah: :blah:

DaleJrFan
06-19-2006, 11:38 AM
Nice, I gotta get me one of these!

angry450r
06-19-2006, 11:51 AM
it needs a lift kit and some stacks!!!

culookn
06-19-2006, 12:58 PM
i bet its a gas guzzler. i bet that dont matter to the guy that owns that rig.

gbcap
06-19-2006, 01:30 PM
with that much money wouldn't you just buy a pusher RV? pimp truck...kinda stupid with the camper back tho.

LT250RMan
06-19-2006, 01:40 PM
I think thats dumb there would'nt be that much weight on the front wheels for steering and why dont they just sleep in the truck it bigger than that crappy liitle camper, i would just go buy a $500,000 motorhome and a strech limo.

CannondaleRider
06-19-2006, 02:13 PM
Originally posted by LT250RMan
I think thats dumb there would'nt be that much weight on the front wheels for steering and why dont they just sleep in the truck it bigger than that crappy liitle camper, i would just go buy a $500,000 motorhome and a strech limo.

There would be plenty of weight actually....more then what the truck came with from the factory.

Kinda crappy imo....imagine the horrible turning radius, do to the lack of a pivot point.

Be better off buying an FL80 and a 60 foot living/box trailer.

parkers30
06-19-2006, 02:33 PM
Exactly and since soooo many of the newer heavy duty Dodges have Cummins in them it probably has PLENTY of weight up there.

I was looking at the turning radius wondering how they even got parked where it is, look how close the cars are behind it I wouldn't want that to be my daily driver:eek2:

nosliw
06-19-2006, 02:41 PM
i wonder how many pieces that driveshaft is

:cool: but still a dodge

LT250RMan
06-19-2006, 03:15 PM
Originally posted by CannondaleRider
There would be plenty of weight actually....more then what the truck came with from the factory.

Kinda crappy imo....imagine the horrible turning radius, do to the lack of a pivot point.

Be better off buying an FL80 and a 60 foot living/box trailer.

how would there be more weight on the front, that camper probaly weights just as much as a 5.6L Cummins and the camper is on the back so it would cause a leverage because it pretty far back.

nosliw
06-19-2006, 03:25 PM
i dont know, i guess the 5.6L must weigh less. the 5.9L on the other hand, weighs about 1100lbs by itself.

LT250RMan
06-19-2006, 03:51 PM
ya oops i meant 5.9L, the camper probaly weighs 1000lbs to.

But who said it a deisel, it could be a V10

CannondaleRider
06-19-2006, 03:56 PM
Originally posted by LT250RMan
how would there be more weight on the front, that camper probaly weights just as much as a 5.6L Cummins and the camper is on the back so it would cause a leverage because it pretty far back.

You can't include just the parts ON the truck.

Whether the camper weighs the same as the motor or not, look at where the fulcrum is. You have to include the weight of the entire truck in front of the rear axle...

LT250RMan
06-19-2006, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by CannondaleRider
You can't include just the parts ON the truck.

Whether the camper weighs the same as the motor or not, look at where the fulcrum is. You have to include the weight of the entire truck in front of the rear axle...

I think its still stupid, the camper is point less why dont they just sleep in the truck its like 3 times bigger than the camper:D

knighttime
06-19-2006, 10:43 PM
not my style.

a fool and his money are soon partying.

that dude will be broke soon.

:huh :eek2: :ermm: