PDA

View Full Version : 250x or 300ex



Honda_exrider
12-27-2005, 04:49 PM
what is the diff. in the 250x and the 300ex. which ones faster and which one is better.

theTman
12-27-2005, 04:50 PM
same thing...electric start....kick start...300ex is prolly faster

XCAdam89
12-27-2005, 04:51 PM
Actually, the 250X is faster because of the fact that it has a higher rev limiter and I think the bore or stroke is different from a 300 as well.

fasterblaster09
12-27-2005, 05:05 PM
Originally posted by XCAdam89
Actually, the 250X is faster because of the fact that it has a higher rev limiter and I think the bore or stroke is different from a 300 as well.

Yup I do beleive he's right.

ZeroLogic
12-27-2005, 05:58 PM
the 250x has a kick start, the 300ex is electric.
the 250x is faster at accelrating because it has a shorter stroke
the 300ex is a tad bit faster at long distance racing

if your going to race i would go with teh 250x IMO

Sjorge450R
12-27-2005, 06:27 PM
yeah go with the 250x for racing, bore it to 300 and get some nice shocks.

TheFontMaster
12-27-2005, 06:36 PM
I would go with the 250x, I had a 300ex, and I hated all the problems I had with the electrics. Other than that, the motor is practicaly bullet proof.

prepracing
12-27-2005, 06:42 PM
Originally posted by XCAdam89
Actually, the 250X is faster because of the fact that it has a higher rev limiter and I think the bore or stroke is different from a 300 as well.

yep... all around faster stock to stock comparison and even better when built. And the later 250x models( '91 & '92 ) had electric start if your not a fan of kickstarting !

Blue250X
12-28-2005, 06:55 AM
Originally posted by prepracing
yep... all around faster stock to stock comparison and even better when built. And the later 250x models( '91 & '92 ) had electric start if your not a fan of kickstarting !

not quite, no elec. start on mine

jab300ex
12-28-2005, 07:55 PM
The 250x should be a little lighter but they are pretty much the same machine. It really depends on what your doin with it. I don't think 250x has reverse. Sometimes electric start is better sometimes kick. I think that they should put kick and electric start on some quads(like the old motorcycles). I loved my 300ex and now I have a blaster. I sold the 300 because I got a good price for it and it sat in my shed for too long and the battery was always dead. I got a blaster for $200.00 and rebuilt the whole thing in 3 weeks. It usually starts 3-5 kicks when I leave it sit.

YZEATER
12-29-2005, 08:54 AM
250x's have reverse. it's almost the same engine as the 300ex.

XCAdam89
12-29-2005, 09:18 AM
It's the exact same engine, except for some minor changes with the stroke and bore.

Honda TRX250ex
12-29-2005, 09:22 AM
250x, i would chose my 250x over a 300ex

underpowered
12-29-2005, 09:52 AM
Originally posted by XCAdam89
Actually, the 250X is faster because of the fact that it has a higher rev limiter and I think the bore or stroke is different from a 300 as well.

not quite. the 250x has a shorter stroke, same bore at the 300 though. i have had both, my 250x was definatle faster in a drag but overall they were about the same other the the 300 had mor bottom end.

Prepracing-no elec. start unti the 300ex in 1993.

jab300ex- 250x had reverse, slightly different actuator than the 300, but still a PITA to work.

Honda TRX250ex
12-29-2005, 10:10 AM
Originally posted by XCAdam89
Actually, the 250X is faster because of the fact that it has a higher rev limiter and I think the bore or stroke is different from a 300 as well.
no, i have a 250x and my brother has a 300ex and im a little bit of a better rider than he is, and we drag raced and he had my in top speed but not in accelation
its about 2 or 3 miles faster

JRP
12-29-2005, 10:56 AM
250x

12-29-2005, 10:59 AM
i think i would have to say the 250 is faster but id rather go with the 300 just cus its a little newer.but you cant beat the prices of some old 250's i have to say

yellow400ex05
12-29-2005, 03:17 PM
there reliable you can restore them they are quicker and old school, also they are kick start.