PDA

View Full Version : PEP Piggyback Pictures !



FHKracingZ
12-20-2005, 01:59 PM
got them today.



http://img414.imageshack.us/img414/934/pepshocks0028go.jpg

http://img414.imageshack.us/img414/7286/pepshocks0035nc.jpg

ZeroLogic
12-20-2005, 02:02 PM
nice:macho

MXracer16
12-20-2005, 02:15 PM
Is that just a clamp they put on them and shorten the hose? Thats all it looks like to me, or is somethign really that different about them?

tamehart
12-20-2005, 02:17 PM
Awesome, Great for PEP to stay on the ball with other companies.


MXRacer- I believe you nailed it

SlapNutz
12-20-2005, 02:18 PM
to put on my quade:scary:

Mxjunkie
12-20-2005, 02:19 PM
Damn those ressies are massive! They look badass :D

FHKracingZ
12-20-2005, 02:22 PM
I went from Elka LT to these so i dont have stocker no more... Accually josh the Front rezzi is the same exact size at the big bottle rear...

jwick07
12-20-2005, 02:29 PM
If you dont mind my asking, how much $$$$? and what are the details of them.. Comp and rebound, ride height, zps ???

watts16
12-20-2005, 02:34 PM
NICE

12-20-2005, 03:03 PM
looks gooooooooood. wnats the diffrence between piggy backs and the non piggybacks? (lol yea i know i dont know the names)

standardryder
12-20-2005, 03:18 PM
Originally posted by nofearrider1
looks gooooooooood. wnats the diffrence between piggy backs and the non piggybacks? (lol yea i know i dont know the names)

piggybacks are like the front's shown in the picture, where the rezzie is mounted to the shock. and remote is like the rear, where there is a line that connects the two:macho

Ridin' Jesse
12-20-2005, 03:20 PM
Originally posted by nofearrider1
looks gooooooooood. wnats the diffrence between piggy backs and the non piggybacks? (lol yea i know i dont know the names)
Piggybacks and Big Bottles. :p I think there is no difference. Except for how they look and how the bottles are placed(as piggybacks or attached to the frame.

Nick110
12-20-2005, 03:36 PM
dang. im gonna have to pick me up a pair of dem babies.:devil:

JDiablo
12-20-2005, 03:39 PM
Look like remote rezzies with a rezzy clamp on the shock and a shorter line :devil:

jrspawn
12-20-2005, 03:57 PM
Yeah, thats all they are, just pep shocks that have a rezzi clamp on the shock with a shorter line. If im mistaken they are still the same "shocks". I believe PEP is going to make a true pickeyback shock sometime, i was at axis the other day and they showed me there new pickeyback fronts and rear's.

Justin

hondardr4life
12-20-2005, 05:21 PM
Yea, I saw them installing those on one of Tim Farr's new 450r's when I was up at Baldwins a few weeks ago. They are just liek everyone said, remote rezzies with short hoses, mounted onto the side of the shock like a remote rezzie.

FHKracingZ
12-20-2005, 10:20 PM
ya , ishould of said remote-piggyback because thats the real name.

Atkins
12-21-2005, 06:25 AM
Why even come out with these? I dont see any advantage over remotes, and personally I think remots give a much cleaner look.

laeger2fiddyr
12-21-2005, 09:47 AM
thats what i think. how do they bolt up, is it a clamp style with a pinch bolt or what? they will prob fall off while racing!!! lol

infantry317
12-21-2005, 10:59 AM
Gee, don't spend any money on product design now...Those made the PEPs even uglier. :devil: Great shocks, but they could bring their design into the 21st century. :ermm:

parkers30
12-21-2005, 02:09 PM
corect me if I am wrong here, just something I was thinking over in my head.

by having a shorter hose like that, wouldn't it make so that the oil actually transfers more into the resevoir, as there is a smaller volume in the hose? possibly making for lower temps and possibly circulating different oil back into the shock?

putting the resevoir there would also make it so it is sticking out into quicker moving air and not blocking the radiator

I just find it had to belive that he would spend the time developing the bracketry for something that doesn't offer any benefits :confused:

Scro
12-21-2005, 02:15 PM
Originally posted by parkers30
corect me if I am wrong here, just something I was thinking over in my head.

by having a shorter hose like that, wouldn't it make so that the oil actually transfers more into the resevoir, as there is a smaller volume in the hose? possibly making for lower temps and possibly circulating different oil back into the shock?

putting the resevoir there would also make it so it is sticking out into quicker moving air and not blocking the radiator

I just find it had to belive that he would spend the time developing the bracketry for something that doesn't offer any benefits :confused:

Those benefits make since.

But, why did they not just do away with the hose all together and just make a piggyback...lol

parkers30
12-21-2005, 02:17 PM
too much investment? :blah:

Scro
12-21-2005, 02:17 PM
And, as they sit in the picture, the hose will be on the front of the shock on one side; and on the back of the shock on the other side...lol

12-22-2005, 11:48 AM
really nice shocks i wish they would come out with a real piggy back rezzy shock. i also think they need to bring the look of those shocks to the 21st centry.

lil400exman
12-22-2005, 12:17 PM
another reason why they are remote mounted with a line is to isolate them from the shock body and by doing this it keeps the oil in the rezzy kool like it should. By making it all one peice it jus transfers the heat to the rezzy defeating the purpose of the rezzy, which is to protect against shock fade.

another thing is they say that most piggyback transfer passage ways arent large enough to really do much. The lines that PEP uses are useful. He has a system that he knws works and hes going to make sure these work 100% before he relases it. Not like other companies making the consumer the R&D crew. Which is not good at all:mad:

all in all im still a PEP man!