PDA

View Full Version : new pix of my car and racing it at the drag strip



kawasaki_ridah
06-23-2005, 02:52 PM
Here ya go enjoy sorry some are blurry i was trying to take cool pix at night
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00598.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00615.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00619.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00617.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00596.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00593.jpg
here are the ones from Bristol Motor Speedway the best i ran was a 15.4 cause i had traction control on :icon32:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00746.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00791.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00704.jpg
even with traction control on i still won every race lol and here is a pic of me sitting in my car before i run
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v327/kawasaki_ridah/DSC00821.jpg

chucked
06-23-2005, 02:56 PM
my s-10 isnt much slower then that.

06-23-2005, 03:05 PM
nice car:cool:

Pman485
06-23-2005, 03:05 PM
Is that all stock?

kawasaki_ridah
06-23-2005, 11:22 PM
yeah its all stock i ran it again with the tc off and got a 14.6 which isnt bad but my 60 ft wasnt great i have headers for it but i need to put em on

LTZ400rider
06-23-2005, 11:36 PM
r u the kid who had a focus before

Doober
06-24-2005, 12:07 AM
awesome car

AlbaKFX
06-24-2005, 12:54 AM
Cmon wheres the exhaust system and supercharger?


JK... sweet car, i'm jealous. The 350Z is my dream ride, except with a few go-fast goodies. Black.

300ex_rider1121
06-24-2005, 06:14 AM
somebody needs a vortsch supercharger or a twin turbo

450r51
06-24-2005, 07:12 AM
my 300zx twin turbo will blow the thing out of the water, nice car though.

HondaEXrider22
06-24-2005, 07:17 AM
Wow thats a nice car

kawasaki_ridah
06-25-2005, 12:23 AM
Originally posted by LTZ400rider
r u the kid who had a focus before

yeah i had a SVT focus i sold it though to get this.. and a stock 300zx is about the same a stock 350z but i twin turbo 350 will dominate there was a guy with a orange one and he ran a 13.1 with a 60 ft time of 2.6 if he could hook up he would be in the low 12s

kawasaki_ridah
06-25-2005, 12:23 AM
Originally posted by 300ex_rider1121
somebody needs a vortsch supercharger or a twin turbo

yeah if you buy me one i promise i will but it on haha

thanx for all the compliments

hemi operator
06-25-2005, 01:25 AM
Be very very carefull....Drag racing is just like crack: Very addictive and very expensive!

If I'm not mistaken, that Z ought to be able to run low 14's stock.

AlbaKFX
06-25-2005, 02:25 AM
How much boost was the orange 350Z running kawasaki_ridah? He's probably got the Greddy bolt-on twinturbo kit. Expensive, but a great performer, even at low boost.

I wish I could find a totally done up 350Z somewhere... but on Streetfire.net theres a couple videos of some fairly quick ones, if you want to check it out. I'm sure getting 475-495WHP wouldn't be too hard, but very expensive.

06-25-2005, 07:30 AM
Originally posted by 450r51
my 300zx twin turbo will blow the thing out of the water, nice car though.

You mean like this one?? TT with stage 3, right at 400HP!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/300ZXTT.jpg

06-25-2005, 07:34 AM
If you don't like the ZTT, how about a new 2005 WRX STI? It will blow the doors off of any 350Z!!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/P1000471.jpg

06-25-2005, 07:36 AM
You say you don't like either one of those? You say you're an old school kind of guy like me, here is my '71 Dodge Challenger with a 440-6 Pak car. 390 HP and a real head turner!!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/challenger.jpg

06-25-2005, 07:37 AM
Old school but like them all original?? How about my 1970 Plymouth Cuda with original 440-6 Pak motor. Car is all original!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/cuda.jpg

06-25-2005, 07:41 AM
You kids don't know what real horsepower and torque really is!!! Feast your eyes on this beauty!! 440 cubic inches with 3 carbs sitting on top!! Can you say "sucks fuel"!!
Who gives a crap about gas mileage with one of these beasts!! Yes, this is how they looked coming right out of the factory in 1970. Ahh yes, the SHAKER too, muscle car at it's finest!! The mopars were the baddest muscle cars ever built!!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/shaker.jpg

chucked
06-25-2005, 07:42 AM
Originally posted by Kyle_TQRA
You kids don't know what real horsepower and torque really is!!! Feast your eyes on this beauty!! 440 cubic inches with 3 carbs sitting on top!! Can you say "sucks fuel"!!
Who gives a crap about gas mileage with one of these beasts!! Yes, this is how they looked coming right out of the factory in 1970. Ahh yes, the SHAKER too, muscle car at it's finest!! The mopars were the baddest muscle cars ever built!!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/shaker.jpg

That is SEXY

honda350r
06-25-2005, 11:06 AM
http://100psi.com/marko-845.wmv

This will smoke a Mopar

06-25-2005, 11:39 AM
My little man!!! There is no replacement for displacement!! Put the same turbo PSI on a 440 or 426 CI Mopar and that Supra will get driven in the asphalt!!!

What do you think all, and I mean ALL of the pro stock, funny cars and top fuel motors are derived from???????????
The baddest motor that has ever been built, the HEMI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

honda350r
06-25-2005, 01:56 PM
I think mopars are ok, I do not think they are the baddest thing ever built!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I will take technology over old boat anchor engines of yester year anyday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mostly
Old
Parts
And
Rust


LOL !!!!!!!!


Just messing with you on the last part !! :D

06-25-2005, 03:43 PM
Originally posted by honda350r
http://100psi.com/marko-845.wmv

This will smoke a Mopar


hey there goes my car
j/k
this is my car
J/K
LOL:p

kawasaki_ridah
06-26-2005, 01:40 AM
Originally posted by AlbaKFX
How much boost was the orange 350Z running kawasaki_ridah? He's probably got the Greddy bolt-on twinturbo kit. Expensive, but a great performer, even at low boost.

I wish I could find a totally done up 350Z somewhere... but on Streetfire.net theres a couple videos of some fairly quick ones, if you want to check it out. I'm sure getting 475-495WHP wouldn't be too hard, but very expensive.

he was running 6 psi and it was the greddy kit but it was awesome i loved it turbonetics makes a sigle turbo which i think i will do since all the supra owners go to a single turbo so it might be better :confused:

kawasaki_ridah
06-26-2005, 01:42 AM
Originally posted by Kyle_TQRA
If you don't like the ZTT, how about a new 2005 WRX STI? It will blow the doors off of any 350Z!!http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/briansgi/P1000471.jpg


sorry to dissapoint ya but im running .2 better than the sti's the run around 14.8s and yes my car should run low 14s but elevation here is different bristol Tn has the slowest ets so 14.6 is about right

JForestZ34
06-26-2005, 06:57 AM
Well if you put those cars stock for stock the hemi would romp on that supra. YOur talking about a stock 1970 cuda going up against a car with probably 10k worth of upgrades into it. How can you even compare those two. That would be like me saying try putting up a top fuel dragster against that supra, oh I wonder which one would win???? YOu can't even compare the two. Put them next to each other the way they came from the factory and see which one will win.


James

06-26-2005, 08:29 AM
Originally posted by kawasaki_ridah
sorry to dissapoint ya but im running .2 better than the sti's the run around 14.8s and yes my car should run low 14s but elevation here is different bristol Tn has the slowest ets so 14.6 is about right

Get your facts straight dude!!! You must be referring to the WRX and not the STI!! The STI does the quarter mile in a whopping 13.1 seconds!!! Don't believe me, here you go:
Here you go!! (http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/features/0307scc_stievo/)

Mxjunkie
06-26-2005, 08:39 AM
I love 350z's and sti's! everytime I see one it makes me want one even more lol. I cant afford one of them though way to much. I guess I'll stick with a old beat up nova once I find one and build it till I'm old and gray :)

TheIceMan
06-26-2005, 09:02 AM
There is no replacement for displacement

very true,but....there are some exceptions to that rule though ;)

http://exit3.i-55.com/~davidlt/buickgnx2.jpg

kawasaki_ridah
06-26-2005, 10:54 PM
Originally posted by Kyle_TQRA
Get your facts straight dude!!! You must be referring to the WRX and not the STI!! The STI does the quarter mile in a whopping 13.1 seconds!!! Don't believe me, here you go:
Here you go!! (http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/features/0307scc_stievo/)

i have my facts strieght where i live the best one has ran is a 14.8

LazeR
06-27-2005, 12:52 AM
Nice car man, get better at shifting and keep that tc off, and you should definately be getting better times, those 350zs are pretty quick from what i hear!

06-27-2005, 07:57 AM
Originally posted by kawasaki_ridah
i have my facts strieght where i live the best one has ran is a 14.8

Dude, put the crack pipe down and slowly back away!! That's why I sent you that unbiased car comparison link! Someone at your track is running 14.8 in an STI so you assume that is what an STI can only run????? That person obviously does not know how to drag race!! All car comparisons and car shootouts that has done real world tests with the STI will show all it's quarter mile times between 13.1 - 13.3 seconds. On the other hand, look at the specs on your 350Z:

Car and Driver:
0-60 - 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile time - 14.3


Here (http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=16&article_id=9269&page_number=1)
is the link, check for yourself.

Oh, and BTW, the STI does 0-60 in a blistering 4.9 seconds!! So in other words, your car is over a second slower in the quarter mile (stock for stock) and almost 1 second slower 0-60. Dude, that is a 4 door family sports sedan!! And the worst part, it's cheaper than your 350Z!!

kawasaki_ridah
06-27-2005, 03:58 PM
Originally posted by Kyle_TQRA
Dude, put the crack pipe down and slowly back away!! That's why I sent you that unbiased car comparison link! Someone at your track is running 14.8 in an STI so you assume that is what an STI can only run????? That person obviously does not know how to drag race!! All car comparisons and car shootouts that has done real world tests with the STI will show all it's quarter mile times between 13.1 - 13.3 seconds. On the other hand, look at the specs on your 350Z:

Car and Driver:
0-60 - 5.8 seconds
1/4 mile time - 14.3


Here (http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=16&article_id=9269&page_number=1)
is the link, check for yourself.

Oh, and BTW, the STI does 0-60 in a blistering 4.9 seconds!! So in other words, your car is over a second slower in the quarter mile (stock for stock) and almost 1 second slower 0-60. Dude, that is a 4 door family sports sedan!! And the worst part, it's cheaper than your 350Z!!


okay i never said that thats all they will run.. here witht the elevation thats all a sti will do evos run 15.2s here and thats not the only sti i have seen run that, that was the best i have seen one run.. and its not cheaper buddy its about 6 grand more than my car the only reason they run half way decent is cause there AWD but im not paying 31 + for that thing when you can get a wrx alot cheaper and make it even faster for less money or better yet get my car and put tts on it walk all over that pos! get off your rally car and come back to reality

450 Racer R
06-27-2005, 06:14 PM
here ya go. this will eat up your sti's and evo's. 390 hp and 430 tq at the wheels
http://www.pfispeed.com/flash/images/carofthemonth/04-05/1_lg.jpg