View Full Version : curtis sparks x4
6858-400ex
02-12-2005, 06:33 AM
what do u think of this
cals400ex
02-12-2005, 10:54 AM
my buddy has this pipe on his built motor and it runs really strong. it doesn't rev quite as high as my buddies hmf and not as high as my x-6. if i had to do it again, i wouldn't get the x-6. i would highly consider the full hmf. the lte seems to make great power too from what i hear. the new pulsecharger that isn't quite out yet seems to be really interesting too.
shamisc
02-12-2005, 01:52 PM
Originally posted by 6858-400ex
what do u think of this
Waste of money, just get the X-6.
6858-400ex
02-12-2005, 02:20 PM
i have a stock motor
shamisc
02-12-2005, 09:55 PM
Read Spark's suggestion on the X-6 on his website. He said the X-6 does better than the X-4 all-around and is exsplosive on top end. I've had both on a stock motor and the X-4 SUCKED!! Also, make damn sure you pay the extra pennies to get the stainless system b/c their ceramic coating is a joke. I've had 6 of their pipes, 5 were ceramic, and they rusted to hell in a month or so. And befroe you ask, my bike gets a extensive washing after every ride! So that's not the problem. Someone who's a Sparks dealer told me that the ceramic coating is actually not ceramic, but a type of powder coating that's not going to hold up to high temps for very long. Jet Hot is the only type of coating that holds up. The stainless X-6 held up great however. It's deff worth the extra money if a spark arrestor is not required for your type of riding. One is available for the X-6 though.
6858-400ex
02-13-2005, 07:01 AM
what kind of differnce will the x6 make on a stock motor since the x4 is for stock motors
shamisc
02-15-2005, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by 6858-400ex
what kind of differnce will the x6 make on a stock motor since the x4 is for stock motors
Same all-around as the X-4, but with more top end!;)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.