+2" or +2.5" Houser a-arms?

[atvrulz]

Hello:
Is there any difference really between the +2" or +2.5" houser a-arms on the YFZ, if you have axis shocks? I guess you would be able to lower your quad a little more with the +2.0" and still be within a 50" width.
Thanks

[ml450r]

A +2 houser front end uses a differnt shock 17.5". you want a +2.5 front end, uses 18.5" shocks. I didn't think houser makes the +2 anymore.

[Freestylemxr]

what size are stock shocks?

[ml450r]

15.5" I think

[Blizzard24]

All Houser LT a arms for the YFZ use 18.5" shocks. the .5, the 2" amd the 2.5". The difference is the +2" will get you to 50" w the std 3+2 offset wheels while the 2.5" will require a 4+1 offset to get you at about 49" wide but will reduce bump steer.
And Houser is still making the 2" a arms.

[ml450r]

Originally posted by OCRaptor
All Houser LT a arms for the YFZ use 18.5" shocks. the .5, the 2" amd the 2.5". The difference is the +2" will get you to 50" w the std 3+2 offset wheels while the 2.5" will require a 4+1 offset to get you at about 49" wide but will reduce bump steer.
And Houser is still making the 2" a arms.

In 2003 houser started making the first a a rms for the YFZ, they were plus 2 and used 17.5 inch shocks, I bought a set, had axis shocks for them, Then they came out with +2.5 and they used 18.5 inch shocks. I bought that set which I now have. They also made a +3 inch a arm that used a 19.5 inch shock. I t made the bike over 50 inches though. They had came to the conclusion last time I talked to them that the 18.5 " set up was the way to go. That makes since that they have the different sizes +.5,+2,+2.5, using the same shocks now. The original +2 with the shorter shocks were just not the "hot ticket" if you know what I mean.

[atvrulz]

How do you like the +2.5 houser arms with the 18.5" axis shocks? I am thinking of running this? Do have alot of variety in adjusting the height of the quad without going past the 50" limit. Any negatives in this setup? thanks

[Blizzard24]

you got it ml450, the shorter shocks had to be dual rate and Houser quickly made their arms w longer shocks. A friend of mine bought the arms that needed 17.5 shocks and a few weeks later they switched it up to run a triple rate. He was a little ticked. :D

[ml450r]

Originally posted by atvrulz
How do you like the +2.5 houser arms with the 18.5" axis shocks? I am thinking of running this? Do have alot of variety in adjusting the height of the quad without going past the 50" limit. Any negatives in this setup? thanks


I have pep shocks now. the arms and shocks work great though, I have no complaints. Houser makes good stuff IMO.

[Shocka400ex]

I have Housers 2.5 front end and I'm getting my Axis in the mail today so I'll let you all know how I like the set after the weekend.
I currently have a borrowed pair of PEPs now and with 4-1 offset wheels I really like this set up for MX.

[atvrulz]

So, whats the review of your new front end of the +2.5 housers and the axis shocks?
thanks

[maskale]

I like Houser but why dont they make the +3, I may go with a different company that makes +3.

[Shocka400ex]

Originally posted by atvrulz
So, whats the review of your new front end of the +2.5 housers and the axis shocks?
thanks

Can you believe I live in Phoenix and it has been raining like a SOB. I'm actually going to the track tomorrow. (Weds) I'll let ya know then.

[Shocka400ex]

Originally posted by maskale
I like Houser but why dont they make the +3, I may go with a different company that makes +3.

Because with 3/2 offset wheels it would put you over 50in wide and wouldn't be allowed for MX. I think even with 4/1 it's too close.
If this isn't a concern to you then you can get +3 from someone else.