PDA

View Full Version : 300ex vs. blaster



300ex_rider1121
11-24-2004, 11:16 AM
which will win straight drag and around the track

awsomeaussies
11-24-2004, 11:42 AM
stock to stock a blaster will win in a drag. But on the track the 300ex has the advantage with better handing. But as always it depends on the rider.

300ex_rider1121
11-24-2004, 12:00 PM
i thought a 300 had a higher top speed than the blaster

300exOH
11-24-2004, 12:02 PM
Originally posted by 300ex_rider1121
i thought a 300 had a higher top speed than the blaster

Nope. The blaster is just a little faster on the top end.

300ex_rider1121
11-24-2004, 12:04 PM
o wat about accelaration and mid

300exOH
11-24-2004, 12:05 PM
The blaster is probably a tad quicker off the line but the mid range is about the same.

2001300exguy
11-24-2004, 09:54 PM
the rider makes all the difference. my friend had a blaster piped and my 300 has an hmf. of the line we were about the same every time. i would keep with him till 4th then he would pull away soem times. i would say they are evenly matched on a drag. but on a track i blow him away

Mxracer53
11-25-2004, 10:03 AM
my 300 had a dg pipe and k&n filter and i draged a blaster with a fmf pipe and silencer and a uni filter and i beat him by like 4 lenths every time.it was pretty quick though.:devil:

YFZ450Ridr
11-25-2004, 10:08 AM
i saw a blaster drag a stock 400 and he BLEW the 400 away. but i think that blaster had somethin done internally cuz he had stock pipes and what not.

400ex men
11-25-2004, 07:33 PM
he would have had to had just about every thing done to it to out run a stock 400ex:)

buster369
11-25-2004, 07:38 PM
blasters: what a piece of junk

bradley300
11-25-2004, 08:25 PM
Originally posted by buster369
blasters: what a piece of junk

please, my blaster is twice the 300ex in your sig.. the only blasters are that are peices of junk are the ones that arent kept up, 300ex's are the same way

m250r
11-25-2004, 09:44 PM
Originally posted by bradley300
please, my blaster is twice the 300ex in your sig.. the only blasters are that are peices of junk are the ones that arent kept up, 300ex's are the same way

I agree completely with bradley...plus he does have one SICK blaster, a nicely kept one such as his can not only be fun to ride but can look really sweet too

blasterrider24
12-20-2004, 10:29 AM
I have a stock blaster and my neighbor has a stock 300ex. We drag race a lot. We have raced around a track once. I kill him in a drag due to good acceleration and about 5MPH higher top speed. On the track its closer but I still win.

P.S.

We are both good riders.

Mxracer53
12-20-2004, 07:00 PM
u dont have 5mph advantage he does and i had a 300 and i raced 300s and draged 300s and blasters and the 300s are faster. u are most likely the bettr rider i had a 300 with a dg pige and k&n filter and i draged 2 300s and 2 blasters and one blaster had fmf pipe sliencer and a filter and i beat him by about 5 bike lenghs evry time. he did get the junp off the start a little.

frosti108
12-20-2004, 08:23 PM
too close to call. its all up to the rider...

ive dragged a few blasters before and beat them because i had a few more mods, but now i just blow them away :devil:

but still, theyre just about equal except i have to say that a stock blaster handles like balls lol

drifterx
12-20-2004, 08:43 PM
I rode a buddy of mine's blaster. I didn't like it at all, it didn't handle that well, and i thought the throttle response was better on my 300. Plus his was a little older, and had total crap for brakes. I like my 300 much better. But hey, thats my opinion! Its all rider, the quads are pretty evenly matched!