PDA

View Full Version : 300ex vs. warrior



300ex_rider1121
07-13-2004, 01:06 PM
which is faster a 300ex or a warrior .....anything will help thanx

PismoGuy400
07-13-2004, 01:45 PM
ive heard warriors are faster but 300s handle better.. there has been more comparisons than you could count, but you just gotta look for them.. in dirtwheels, i think ive read articles that overall the 300 was better but the warrior had a couple strong points and one of them was speed/power:confused:

Rdhanded2
07-13-2004, 03:11 PM
I have both, and although the 300 is a better all around machine, the warrior is faster. That is stock vs stock.

300ex_rider1121
07-13-2004, 03:23 PM
if i put a pipe on it ( hmf wit white brothers headpipe) would it be faster

300ex_rider1121
07-13-2004, 03:24 PM
i just got to beat my cuz since he talkin all that junk

mustang
07-13-2004, 04:41 PM
warriors are slow as chit and have no low end :blah:

warrior369
07-13-2004, 10:01 PM
warrior lack top end, they have plenty of low end... the low end is comparable to a 400ex.

FF1O5
07-14-2004, 03:41 AM
Originally posted by warrior369
warrior lack top end, they have plenty of low end... the low end is comparable to a 400ex.

not quite,my friend has a an 03 warrior with a pipe/filter/jets and the only way to wheelie is lean back as hard as you can and dump the clutch,and the balance point on those things suck.300ex's are fun as hell:devil:

warrior369
07-14-2004, 05:00 AM
yea, im not saying the wheelie real well, but low end power is great on them. good hillclimbing bike because the front end stays down.